A thought-provoking discussion on how architecture can transcend functionality to become a form of art, while preserving cultural heritage and ensuring long-term sustainability. The session, “Fusion of Art, Space & Design”, moderated by Sapna Srivastava (Editor, Realty+), with a panel comprising Jamshed Banaji (Principal Architect, Banaji & Associates), Nitin Killawala (Director, Group Seven Architects + Planners), Suresh Babu (Principal & Founder, Suresh Babu and Partners), and Vivek Kishore (Principal Architect, Finer Edge).
The conversation began with the question of when a space truly becomes art. One view emphasized that architecture should not be designed with the sole intention of creating art. Instead, its primary aim must be functionality and sustainability, allowing artistry to emerge naturally. The panel noted that in many European cities, urban planning includes dedicated spaces and budgets for public art, ensuring it is woven into the fabric of daily life. In contrast, creating isolated or inaccessible “art islands” was considered counterproductive; design must remain timeless and engage meaningfully with its surroundings.
From there, the discussion shifted to the emotional dimension of architecture. Beyond the basics of form, arithmetic, geometry, and structural function, panelists highlighted the need to embed emotional, aesthetic, sustainable, social, and cultural layers. These intangible elements, they argued, are what transform a functional building into an architectural work of art creating spaces that not only serve but inspire. Whether through a sense of comfort, joy, or awe, such designs leave a deeper, more enduring impact on their users.
The emotional impact was tied closely to intellectual curiosity. Examples like the Lotus Temple in Delhi or Barcelona’s Sagrada Familia were cited as works that go beyond practical utility to evoke wonder and provoke contemplation. Such buildings heighten the senses, inviting visitors to engage with them in a way that is both visceral and reflective.
However, the panelists were quick to note that art in architecture is subjective. What may strike one viewer as profoundly artistic might leave another unmoved. Yet, successful architecture often shares two qualities: it sparks conversation and remains accessible to a broad audience. For instance, the integration of Indian art at Mumbai’s Terminal 2 Airport was seen as a way to celebrate culture while making it part of a public space, rather than confining it to galleries or elite enclaves.
Heritage preservation emerged as a significant thread in the conversation. The speakers explored how historical motifs and traditional design elements can be reinterpreted for modern contexts. From temple carvings inspiring contemporary convention center facades to traditional patterns influencing modern cladding, they stressed the importance of intentional adaptation. Superficial use of heritage symbols, they warned, risks reducing them to mere decoration. Instead, meaningful integration from the conceptual stage ensures authenticity and resonance.
The debate also touched on urban identity. Globalization has led to a sense of sameness in modern architecture, particularly in corporate and IT campuses that look alike across continents. The panelists argued for a stronger commitment to contextual design fusing heritage with contemporary techniques to create spaces that reflect local character while meeting modern needs. They saw art in architecture not as a luxury, but as a responsibility to enrich the urban fabric, encourage public interaction, and contribute to civic pride.
The panel concluded that the fusion of art, space, and design is not about opulence or spectacle, but about crafting experiences. Architecture that integrates functionality, sustainability, cultural memory, and emotional depth has the power to influence not just how people live, but how they think, feel, and connect with their environment. This, they suggested, is the legacy worth leaving for the next generation.
